RE: [HACKERS] RE: [BUGS] Update is not atomic

2001-06-21 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > Incrementing comand counter is not enough - dirty reads are required > > to handle concurrent PK updates. > > What's that with you and dirty reads? Every so often you tell > me that something would require them - you really like to > read dirty things - no? :-) Dirty things o

RE: [HACKERS] RE: [BUGS] Update is not atomic

2001-06-20 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > > update a set a=a+1 where a>2; > > > ERROR: Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index a_pkey > > > > We use uniq index for UK/PK but shouldn't. Jan? > > What else can you use than an index? A "deferred until > statement end" trigger checking for duplicates? Think it'