[PATCHES] [NOT] (LIKE|ILIKE) (ANY|SOME|ALL) (subquery...)

2004-03-28 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear patchers, Please find my second micro-patch submission for this minor inconsistency. I put comments about why "SIMILAR TO" cannot be handled simply in the code rather that in the test, as it seemed more logical. Have a nice day, -- Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]*** ./src/backend/parse

Re: [PATCHES] FAQ updates

2004-03-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Robert Treat wrote: > resubmitting FAQ updates based on html version. > > Robert Treat > > On Friday 19 March 2004 10:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Can I get HTML diffs against contrib/src/FAQ

[PATCHES] Translation Updates for 7.3: pg_dump-ru.po.gz;psql-ru.po.gz

2004-03-28 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hello, This should complete traslation updates for 7.3. Please install. $ msgfmt -v -c pg_dump-ru.po 433 translated messages. $ msgfmt -v -c psql-ru.po 251 translated messages. Thanks, -s pg_dump-ru.po.gz;psql-ru.po.gz pg_dump-ru.po.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data psql-ru.po.gz Des

Re: [PATCHES] Removing cruft in access/transam/xact.c

2004-03-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:16:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > After all this, I still think the TRANS state is unnecesary. I will add > checks in the low level routines so they see what TBLOCK state they are > called in, which should be enough to keep the current functionality > and robustnes

Re: [PATCHES] Removing cruft in access/transam/xact.c

2004-03-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: [...] > The similar changes that remove the ability to recognize failures > during AbortTransaction are even worse, because cleanup after a failed > transaction is exactly where you would most expect software bugs to > pop up. Hey, I was

Re: [PATCHES] Removing cruft in access/transam/xact.c

2004-03-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 09:12:15PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This patch removes the unnecesary TRANS_* states that supposedly > > > represented "low level transaction state". The sta