Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
The only thing I considered wrong with the previous patch was it's odd
behaviour w.r.t. creation of types with the same name as one in
pg_catalog. However, Tom said this is not a serious issue given the
same problem exists in many other places
Hi,
The only thing I considered wrong with the previous patch was it's odd
behaviour w.r.t. creation of types with the same name as one in
pg_catalog. However, Tom said this is not a serious issue given the
same problem exists in many other places in PostgreSQL.
So, I've added some regression