-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scott.marlowe
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:23 PM
To: Paul Tuckfield
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Nuzum; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rob
Fielding
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Configuring PostgreSQL to minimize impact of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjoern Metzdorf
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:11 PM
To: scott.marlowe
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pgsql-Admin (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options
scott.marlowe wrote:
>>Next drives I'll buy wil
Greetings all,
I'm wondering is there a website where people can submit their pgbench
results along with their hardware and configuration's? If so where are they
at? I have yet to find any. I think this could be a very useful tool not
only for people looking at setting up a new server but for peo
cular application to see how it reacts.
Rob Sell wrote:
> Not being one to hijack threads, but I haven't heard of this performance
hit
> when using HT, I have what should all rights be a pretty fast server, dual
> 2.4 Xeons with HT 205gb raid 5 array, 1 gig of memory. And it is only 50%
as
>
Not being one to hijack threads, but I haven't heard of this performance hit
when using HT, I have what should all rights be a pretty fast server, dual
2.4 Xeons with HT 205gb raid 5 array, 1 gig of memory. And it is only 50% as
fast as my old server which was a dual AMD MP 1400's with a 45gb raid
