Re: [PERFORM] Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K?

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
I'd use two of your drives to create a mirrored partition where pg_xlog resides separate from the actual data. RAID 10 is probably appropriate for the remaining drives. Fortunately, you're not using Dell, so you don't have to worry about the Perc3/Di RAID controller, which is not so compatible

Re: [PERFORM] What about utility to calculate planner cost constants?

2005-03-21 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
If by not practical you mean, no one has implemented a multivariable testing approach, I'll agree with you. But multivariable testing is definitely a valid statistical approach to solving just such problems. -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC

Re: [PERFORM] Upgrading from from 7.4.2 to 8.0

2005-01-26 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
It should be noted that users who use Slony can create a subscriber node running 8.0 that subscribes to a node running 7.4.x and can transition with only the downtime required for failover. This obviates the need for a dump/restore. See http://slony.info/. -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell

Re: [PERFORM] Alternatives to Dell?

2004-12-02 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
I've been at companies where we've had good experiences with Penguin Computing servers. http://www.penguincomputing.com/ I always evaluate their offerings when considering server purchases or recommendations. -tfo -- Thomas F. O'Connell Co-Founder, Information Architect Sitening, LLC

[PERFORM] Performance Anomalies in 7.4.5

2004-10-21 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
I'm seeing some weird behavior on a repurposed server that was wiped clean and set up to run as a database and application server with postgres and Apache, as well as some command-line PHP scripts. The box itself is a quad processor (2.4 GHz Intel Xeons) Debian woody GNU/Linux (2.6.2)

Re: [PERFORM] Performance Anomalies in 7.4.5

2004-10-21 Thread Thomas F.O'Connell
37203-6320 615-260-0005 On Oct 21, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote: Aggregate (cost=0.02..0.02 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=298321.421..298321.422 rows=1 loops=1) - Nested Loop (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=1.771