2010/2/10 Tom Lane
> Franck Routier writes:
> > I am wondering if deferring foreign key constraints (instead of
> > disableing them) would increase performance, compared to non deferred
> > constraints
>
> No, it wouldn't make any noticeable difference AFAICS. It would
> postpone the work from
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 15:56:40 Tom Lane wrote:
> Franck Routier writes:
> > I am wondering if deferring foreign key constraints (instead of
> > disableing them) would increase performance, compared to non deferred
> > constraints
>
> No, it wouldn't make any noticeable difference AFAICS.
Franck Routier writes:
> I am wondering if deferring foreign key constraints (instead of
> disableing them) would increase performance, compared to non deferred
> constraints
No, it wouldn't make any noticeable difference AFAICS. It would
postpone the work from end-of-statement to end-of-transac
Hi,
I am trying to improve delete performance on a database with several
foreign keys between relations that have 100M or so rows.
Until now, I have manually disabled the triggers, done the delete, and
re-enabled the triggers.
This works, but I have to do that when I am sure no other user will
a
