Guys, just so you know:
OSDL did some testing and found Ext3 to be perhaps the worst FS for
PostgreSQL
-- although this testing was with the default options. Ext3 involved an
almost 40% write performance penalty compared with Ext2, whereas the
penalty
for ReiserFS and JFS was less than
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 10:18 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys, just so you know:
OSDL did some testing and found Ext3 to be perhaps the worst FS for PostgreSQL
-- although this testing was with the default options. Ext3 involved an
almost 40% write performance penalty compared with Ext2,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Anyway, with fsync enabled using standard fsync(), I get roughly
|
|300-400
|
|inserts per second. With fsync disabled, I get about 7000 inserts per
|second. When I re-enable fsync but use the open_sync option, I can get
Anyway, with fsync enabled using standard fsync(), I get roughly
300-400
inserts per second. With fsync disabled, I get about 7000 inserts per
second. When I re-enable fsync but use the open_sync option, I can get
about 2500 inserts per second.
You are getting 300-400 inserts/sec with fsync
Guys, just so you know:
OSDL did some testing and found Ext3 to be perhaps the worst FS for PostgreSQL
-- although this testing was with the default options. Ext3 involved an
almost 40% write performance penalty compared with Ext2, whereas the penalty
for ReiserFS and JFS was less than 10%.
