> I have been reading all this technical talk about costs and such that
> I don't (_yet_) understand.
>
> Now I'm scared... what's the fastest way to do an equivalent of
> count(*) on a table to know how many items it has?
Make sure to analyze the database frequently and check pg_class for
reltup
On 11/25/05, Rodrigo Madera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading all this technical talk about costs and such that
> I don't (_yet_) understand.
>
> Now I'm scared... what's the fastest way to do an equivalent of
> count(*) on a table to know how many items it has?
>
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo
