Hello,
on 09/20/2005 01:51 PM Murray @ PlanetThoughtful said the following:
I do not understand why this could bother you or anybody else. If you
have a better solution, nothing stops you to make your recommendations.
Hi Manuel,
I did make my recommendation. To you. It went something like
Hello,
on 09/20/2005 10:04 AM Michael Sims said the following:
This is not to trivialize your Metastorage project (or, to be more
accurate, I know nothing about it, so it's not my place to trivialize
it or otherwise), but to point out that 'out-of-the-box' solutions to
fundamental coding
on 09/19/2005 02:33 PM Chris W. Parker said the following:
Let's take for example a class called 'Customer' that (obviously)
manipulates customers in the database. Here is a very basic Customer
class. (Data validation and the like are left out for brevity.)
This is a basic object
Murray @ PlanetThoughtful wrote:
Once he understands how to solve class abstraction problems such as
the one he is asking about, he will be better equipped to deal with a
wider range of application development tasks.
I agree with this.
This is not to trivialize your Metastorage project (or,
Michael Sims wrote:
Murray @ PlanetThoughtful wrote:
Once he understands how to solve class abstraction problems such as
the one he is asking about, he will be better equipped to deal with a
wider range of application development tasks.
I agree with this.
This is not to trivialize your
Hello,
on 09/20/2005 04:59 AM Murray @ PlanetThoughtful said the following:
Let's take for example a class called 'Customer' that (obviously)
manipulates customers in the database. Here is a very basic Customer
class. (Data validation and the like are left out for brevity.)
This is a basic
[snippage]
I do not understand why this could bother you or anybody else. If you
have a better solution, nothing stops you to make your recommendations.
Hi Manuel,
I did make my recommendation. To you. It went something like (and I'm
paraphrasing), Your proposed solution doesn't solve the
This is not to trivialize your Metastorage project (or, to be more
accurate, I know nothing about it, so it's not my place to trivialize
it or otherwise), but to point out that 'out-of-the-box' solutions to
fundamental coding development problems probably ultimately makes for
a poorer
Murray @ PlanetThoughtful wrote:
My post was not aimed at saying 'using packaged approaches to solve
coding problems is bad', but to say 'the original poster is asking a
fundamental learning question, so a packaged approach will possibly,
maybe even probably, hamper his development as a
Murray @ PlanetThoughtful mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 8:15 AM said:
And it's also worth mentioning at this point that it might present
more of a challenge to the original poster to implement and make use
of a complex data abstraction package [1] than to learn a
10 matches
Mail list logo