Harry Sufehmi wrote:
Hi, my company's looking to buy a PHP encoder to secure the source code.
The encoded scripts should be able to run on Solaris platform (Apache webserver), and
should only require minimum changes to the server.
I looked on Zend Encoder and was ready to suggest it when I realis
Chris, quite a few people sell their scripts online or they may wish to
install legacy code that they have sweated over for years onto a clients
machine - encoding them helps for piece of mind :)
Ade
> >
> I'm sorry I can't help you but I am curious as to what the
> point of this
> is. If you
On 04/02/2004 at 09:35 Chris W wrote:
>>Hi, my company's looking to buy a PHP encoder to secure the source code.
>>The encoded scripts should be able to run on Solaris platform (Apache
>webserver), and should only require minimum changes to the server.
>>
>I'm sorry I can't help you but I am curiou
Hi Larry, many thanks for the recommendation. That will be just perfect.
I've informed my manager about it, and I imagine he'd be happy for the fact that we'll
be saving quite a lot of money as well.
Also thanks for the other recommendations - but unfortunately, we need Solaris
compatibility no
On 05 February 2004 11:30, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
<...SNIP...>
> As you can see, the content will be secured, but the script
> is now becoming the weak point since it'll store the
> encryption key needed to decrypt the content.
I hope you don't mean that literally. If you're really being securit
So double-encoding it (using a PHP encoder) will make life finally very hard for said cracker.
No its not ...
if I would badly need to get this encrypted page and have access to
files ...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 05/02/2004 at 11:48 Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
>On 05 February 2004 11:30, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
>> As you can see, the content will be secured, but the script
>> is now becoming the weak point since it'll store the
>> encryption key needed to decrypt the content.
>
>I hope you don't m
On 05/02/2004 at 14:07 Andrei Reinus wrote:
>> So double-encoding it (using a PHP encoder) will make life finally very
>hard for said cracker.
>
>No its not ...
>if I would badly need to get this encrypted page and have access to files ...
So there's a reasonably easy way to decrypt those encoded
On 05 February 2004 13:10, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
> On 05/02/2004 at 11:48 Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
> > On 05 February 2004 11:30, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
> > > As you can see, the content will be secured, but the script
> > > is now becoming the weak point since it'll store the
> > > encr
On 05/02/2004 at 13:17 Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
>On 05 February 2004 13:10, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
>> On 05/02/2004 at 11:48 Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
>> > On 05 February 2004 11:30, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
>> > > As you can see, the content will be secured, but the script
>> >
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:13, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
> So there's a reasonably easy way to decrypt those encoded files then ? (despite
> those vendors' claim...)
There isn't a program to revert encoded files to their original state,
but there is a disassembler[1]. However, assuming your encryption
On 05/02/2004 at 10:46 Adam Bregenzer wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:13, Harry Sufehmi wrote:
>> So there's a reasonably easy way to decrypt those encoded files then ?
>(despite those vendors' claim...)
>There isn't a program to revert encoded files to their original state,
>but there is a disass
12 matches
Mail list logo
