On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 11:07 +0100, Luke wrote:
> don't forget that the complexity of the PHP is increased muchly with
> multiple databases... Keep it simple...
You must be doing it wrong. Global $db perchance?
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP
rom: Martin Zvarík [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:05 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] CMS-Blog system
Thank you for all the comments.
Thanks for the WP tip: I don't know much about wordpress (it looks
good), but I have tryed enough of open-
04, 2008 5:05 AM
> > To: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] CMS-Blog system
> >
> > Thank you for all the comments.
> >
> > Thanks for the WP tip: I don't know much about wordpress (it looks
> > good), but I have tryed enough of op
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Zvarík [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:05 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: Re: [PHP] CMS-Blog system
>
> Thank you for all the comments.
>
> Thanks for the WP tip: I don'
Le jeudi 04 septembre 2008 à 10:31 +0100, Stut a écrit :
> On 4 Sep 2008, at 06:56, Yannick Warnier wrote:
>
> > Le mercredi 03 septembre 2008 à 22:07 +0100, Luke a écrit :
> >> seperate databases is a hassle, since you have to mess with multiple
> >> connections, I would go with the one database.
Please keep replies on the list.
On 4 Sep 2008, at 11:38, Martin Zvarík wrote:
On 4 Sep 2008, at 11:04, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Thank you for all the comments.
Thanks for the WP tip: I don't know much about wordpress (it looks
good), but I have tryed enough of open-source CMS to say that they
On 4 Sep 2008, at 11:04, Martin Zvarík wrote:
Thank you for all the comments.
Thanks for the WP tip: I don't know much about wordpress (it looks
good), but I have tryed enough of open-source CMS to say that they
are based on messy solutions (one for all = joomla) + it won't be
free blog sy
Thank you for all the comments.
Thanks for the WP tip: I don't know much about wordpress (it looks
good), but I have tryed enough of open-source CMS to say that they are
based on messy solutions (one for all = joomla) + it won't be free blog
system, so I don't think using this free system woul
On 4 Sep 2008, at 06:56, Yannick Warnier wrote:
Le mercredi 03 septembre 2008 à 22:07 +0100, Luke a écrit :
seperate databases is a hassle, since you have to mess with multiple
connections, I would go with the one database. Just cut down on data
storage, use userids instead of usernames for id
On 3 Sep 2008, at 22:01, Martin Zvarík wrote:
I am working on CMS-Blog system, which will be using approx. 10 000
users.
I have a basic question - I believe there are only two options -
which one is better?
1) having separate databases for each blog = fast
(problem: what if I will need to
Le mercredi 03 septembre 2008 à 22:07 +0100, Luke a écrit :
> seperate databases is a hassle, since you have to mess with multiple
> connections, I would go with the one database. Just cut down on data
> storage, use userids instead of usernames for identification in the tables
> and such.
Not onl
Martin Zvarík schreef:
Hi,
I am working on CMS-Blog system, which will be using approx. 10 000 users.
using them? sounds like google or M$
I have a basic question - I believe there are only two options - which
one is better?
1) having separate databases for each blog = fast
(problem: wha
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Martin Zvarík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on CMS-Blog system, which will be using approx. 10 000 users.
>
> I have a basic question - I believe there are only two options - which one
> is better?
>
> 1) having separate databases for each blog =
seperate databases is a hassle, since you have to mess with multiple
connections, I would go with the one database. Just cut down on data
storage, use userids instead of usernames for identification in the tables
and such.
2008/9/3 Martin Zvarík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on CMS-B
14 matches
Mail list logo
