On 15 January 2011 23:46, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>
>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
>
On 16 January 2011 00:22, wrote:
> Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53747&edit=1
>
> ID: 53747
> Updated by: phi...@php.net
> Reported by: vovan-ve at yandex dot ru
> Summary: CHM manual releases are failing
> Status: Verifie
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 13:46, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I think we should only get rid of<< php 5.0.
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to generate the PHP 4 manual and have it
> sitting somewhere separate and the same thing for 5.0 and 5.1?
That would actually be a good practice fo
Hi!
I think we should only get rid of<< php 5.0.
I wonder if it would be possible to generate the PHP 4 manual and have
it sitting somewhere separate and the same thing for 5.0 and 5.1?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
Following are the top 20 pages of the manual, sorted by the number
of user notes contributed. These sections could use a polish, those
notes represent 6.8% of the 24857 total user notes.
Notes | Page
---+-
108 | http://php.net/manual
I think we should only get rid of << php 5.0.
If it is possible a sample old and new page should be created that
shows how the normal process of changes should follow in the
documentation.
Regards,
Pedram
On 1/16/11, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 2011/1/15 Daniel Brown :
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:5
2011/1/15 Daniel Brown :
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:52, Julien Pauli wrote:
>>
>> Last time (http://marc.info/?l=phpdoc&m=128686832705180&w=2) , we
>> suggested that [old-and-not-supported-versions] = PHP4 + PHP5.0 +
>> PHP5.1 ; and [up-to-date-versions] = PHP5.2 + PHP5.3
>
> -1
>
> Gettin
