On viernes, 7 de octubre de 2016 4:56:03 P. M. ART Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
[snip]
> > And also: yes, -fPIE needs overriding if using hardening flags.
>
> can you explain that in more detail? what specifically should be
> overridden and where?
Sure. Hardening adds -fPIE to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS,
Hey,
> >> -PIC implies -fPIE. Replacing -fPIE with -fPIC is the right thing to do,
> >> and is needed to get the code working with Qt 5.4.2+.
> >
> > And also: yes, -fPIE needs overriding if using hardening flags.
>
> can you explain that in more detail? what specifically should be
>
On Fri 2016-10-07 16:33:20 -0400, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On viernes, 7 de octubre de 2016 6:35:00 P. M. ART Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:54:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > I've been reading about -fPIC and -fpic and -fPIE and -fpie and -pie for
Hey,
> I'm not entirely sure what to do about the name of the library during
> this handoff -- it might drop the "kf5" prefix. If we don't drop the
> "kf5" prefix, i suppose we'll need an epoch number in the package
> version to make sure that upgrades happen. It's also possible that
> we'll
On viernes, 7 de octubre de 2016 6:35:00 P. M. ART Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:54:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I've been reading about -fPIC and -fpic and -fPIE and -fpie and -pie for
> > years and i confess i've never completely understood the differences or
> >
¡Hola Maximiliano!
On Fri 2016-10-07 09:45:25 -0400, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Yes, sorry for not replying sooner. We are not planning to upload a new
> version of gpgmepp (we are currently skipping 16.08 and upstream is
> apparently
> dropping gpgmepp for 16.12).
ok, cool. so then taking
On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 08:54:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I've been reading about -fPIC and -fpic and -fPIE and -fpie and -pie for
> years and i confess i've never completely understood the differences or
> whether one is "stronger" than another.
>
> gcc says of -fPIE and -fpic "generated
(resending on list)
Qt and KDE libs are built with -fPIC, which, afaik, is stronger and
incompatible with -fPIE, would it be an option to use -fPIC for gpgme?
On October 7, 2016 3:48:39 AM GMT+02:00, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On Thu 2016-10-06 19:51:57 -0400, Sandro
Hey,
I now started to build cpp and qt bindings for gpgme but ran into a issue with
the hardening flags. The problem is the -fPIE. With this enabled configure
stops with:
configure:19628: checking whether a simple qt program can be built
configure:19639: g++ -o conftest -g -O2