Add pay...@er.paypal.com to your Address Book
hi fellow packagers,
in the recent discussion about "pd-iemambi" it was correctly noted that
this binary package "recommends" to install a non-existing package
"pd-iemlib".
i had wanted to do the packaging for this for years, but had never found
time yet, so i decided to do it now.
i've pushed ev
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:10:34 +0100
Source: x42-plugins
Binary: x42-plugins
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20131119-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Jaromír Mi
On 11/21/2013 04:41 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * IOhannes m zmoelnig [2013-11-21 10:37]:
>> it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as
>> they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing.
>>
>> if your package has not been in debian yet (which
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:47:23 +0100
Source: mjpegtools
Binary: mjpegtools mjpegtools-dbg mjpegtools-gtk libmjpegtools-dev
liblavfile-2.1-0 liblavjpeg-2.1-0 liblavplay-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0
libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0 libmplex
Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#727097: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #727097,
regarding mjpegtools: trying to overwrite errors for library dependencies of
mjpegtools
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#709256: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #709256,
regarding mjpegtools: broken symlink /usr/bin/lav2avi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#727635: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #727635,
regarding lib*-2.1-0 and lib*-2.0-0: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x42-plugins_20131119-1.dsc
x42-plugins_20131119.orig.tar.xz
x42-plugins_20131119-1.debian.tar.gz
x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host fran
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package easytag
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package easytag
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #727811 (http://bugs.debian.org/727811)
# Bug title: easytag: Does not accept a path a
Package: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The libtool archive files /usr/lib/libvamp-hostsdk.la and
/usr/lib/libvamp-sdk.la are
invalid and break building packages with libtool. Please remove these files
from the
package in stable. They are already removed in
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:53:43 +0100
Source: libltc
Binary: libltc-dev libltc-doc libltc11 libltc-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainer
libltc_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libltc_1.1.3-1.dsc
libltc_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
libltc_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.gz
libltc-dev_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
libltc-doc_1.1.3-1_all.deb
libltc11_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
libltc-dbg_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [2013-11-21 10:37]:
> it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as
> they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing.
>
> if your package has not been in debian yet (which i think is true),
> you should get rid of any hacks like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-11-21 09:30, Hauke Wintjen wrote:
>>> Why do you change the SONAME from upstream? That's a pretty
>>> unusual thing to do.
>>> patches/0001-Add-SONAME-to-libraries.patch
>
> Because upstream does not add a SONAME and jsprickerhoff had it in
On 21/11/2013 10:11, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 09.11.2013, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Lorenzo:
Please package for amd64
According to the Debian Developer's Reference [1], the following steps
are required to enable a non-free package to be auto-built:
1. Check whether it is legall
Am Samstag, den 09.11.2013, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Lorenzo:
> Please package for amd64
According to the Debian Developer's Reference [1], the following steps
are required to enable a non-free package to be auto-built:
1. Check whether it is legally allowed and technically possible to
a
Hi.
> Hans-Christoph Steiner hat am 20. November 2013 um 20:13
> geschrieben:
>
>
>
> The first thing that needs doing is the debian/copyright file. All of the
> various licenses of the code that are included in the openni source release
> need to be marked in there, or the Debian ftp-masters
19 matches
Mail list logo
