Having said this, I do think that the description could and probably
should be improved.
Word.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multime
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:14:26 (EDT), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 05.07.2010 13:35, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
>> Just say "This version of ffmpeg is NOT compiled against ... "
>> or This package differs from the default compilation in that ..."
>
> There is no such thing like a "default comp
Am 05.07.2010 13:35, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
Just say "This version of ffmpeg is NOT compiled against ... "
or This package differs from the default compilation in that ..."
There is no such thing like a "default compilation" but anyway, the
package descriptions could be improved to refle
> "FG" == Fabian Greffrath writes:
FG> Am 05.07.2010 13:16, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
>> OK, but still maybe the package Description shouldn't be as upbeat as it
>> currently is.
FG> I am getting tired. Patches accepted.
Just say "This version of ffmpeg is NOT compiled against ... "
or T
Am 05.07.2010 13:16, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
OK, but still maybe the package Description shouldn't be as upbeat as it
currently is.
I am getting tired. Patches accepted.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@li
OK, but still maybe the package Description shouldn't be as upbeat as it
currently is.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintai
Am 02.07.2010 17:50, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
So they spread the word "forget ffmpeg".
There is a reason for everything and there is even documentation for
(nearly) everything. People who keep themselves informed should know
about both and not render premature justice.
So that's why yo
All I know is it seems to the average user that ffmpeg can't even make
.mp3s, a rather common format.
So they spread the word "forget ffmpeg".
So that's why your patch should at least say
***Probable causes:...
There's only a small chance that the user will be "nurd" enough to dig
out the README
Am 02.07.2010 15:59, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
However, I agree that the error message
Encoder (codec id 86017) not found for output stream #0.0
should be improved to at least call the encoder by name.
Which will be done by the attached patch. Would you please try it out?
- Fabian
diff --
[Dammit, this didn't go to the bug and submitter by accident.]
Am 02.07.2010 15:34, schrieb jida...@jidanni.org:
The reason may be documented in /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/README.Debian.gz
but it is very hard to tell.
I fail to see what is difficult to understand in this sentence from
README.Debia
10 matches
Mail list logo