On Thursday 23 October 2014 13:20:06 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
> > >
> > > a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> > >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
> >
> > a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
>
That doesn't make sense, that commit is from September 15 and
On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
>
> a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
That doesn't make sense, that commit is from September 15 and is already in
5.3.0.
PS: please CC me for urgent requests...
>Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 22:17:38 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2014, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > I need approval from Marco and other David.
> >
> > after a quick chat with David E this morning, I would revert that patch
> > (and then remove the plugin in plasma-workspace master)
> >
On Monday 13 October 2014, Marco Martin wrote:
> > I need approval from Marco and other David.
>
> after a quick chat with David E this morning, I would revert that patch
> (and then remove the plugin in plasma-workspace master)
> *but* this only if there will be a 5.3.1 (there should be a fix in
On Monday 13 of October 2014 13:07:35 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> > On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
> how we
>
> > > > proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Reverting a39328433
On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> > >
> > > Assuming we don't have a time machine our options are:
> > > - revert this commit and release plasma-framework 5.3.1 really quickly
> >
> > Please go with this option...
>
> I need approval from Marco and other David.
>
> David
eh
On Sunday 12 October 2014 20:48:36 David Edmundson wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
> how we
>
> > > > proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Reverting a
On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
>
> On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
how we
> > > proceed.
> > >
> > > Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
> >
> > everything w
On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out how we
> > proceed.
> >
> > Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
>
> everything work.
>
> Assuming we don't have a time machine our o
>
>
> I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out how we
> proceed.
>
> Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
everything work.
Assuming we don't have a time machine our options are:
- revert this commit and release plasma-framework 5.3.1 really
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2014 16:24:52 David Edmundson wrote:
> > Packagers,
> >
> > It seems Plasma 5.0 does NOT run smoothly against Plasma Framework 5.3.
> >
> > It would be easiest if distros hold off shipping frameworks 5.3 until
> > Plasma 5
On Friday 10 of October 2014 16:23:41 David Edmundson wrote:
> Packagers,
>
> It seems Plasma 5.0 does NOT run smoothly against Plasma Framework 5.3.
>
> It would be easiest if distros hold off shipping frameworks 5.3 until
> Plasma 5.1 when Plasma5.1 is released.
>
> Clearly this is a screw-up
Packagers,
It seems Plasma 5.0 does NOT run smoothly against Plasma Framework 5.3.
It would be easiest if distros hold off shipping frameworks 5.3 until
Plasma 5.1 when Plasma5.1 is released.
Clearly this is a screw-up and we need to come up with some better policies
when we plan Plasma 5.2
Sor
16 matches
Mail list logo