Hi Darren!
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:33:52PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 08:46, David Herrmann wrote:
>> > The thinkpad_acpi driver currently emits error messages on unsupport
are supported by the i915 driver just fine.
Downgrade the error message to a normal pr_info() and stop telling people
to report it to IBM.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann
---
drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform
Hi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Nick wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index 76441dc..dfd2243 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -1238,7 +1238,7 @@ static ssize_
Hi Len
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Corentin Chary
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Corentin Chary
>> wrote:
>>> On these laptops, the ACPI video is not functional, and very unlikely
>>> to be fixed by the vendor. Note th
e a charm on my N210 with linux-3.2. Feel free to add a:
Tested-by: David Herrmann
I will talk to the intel drm developers about the intel_backlight
issues as they don't seem related to this driver.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platf
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Richard Schütz wrote:
>> Am 29.12.2011 11:23, schrieb Corentin Chary:
>>>
>>> On 12/26/2011 11:22 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:12:57PM +, Andrzej Prochyra wrote:
>> 'acpi_video0' not functional. Brightness can be controlled through
>> intel_backlight interface. There are 21 brightness levels and the
>> backlight can be turned off.
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> Hi David,I refreshed the patches on the github repo, could you re-try
> them ?Thanks
Works great. The error message doesn't appear anymore. The devices
still work as expected.
Tested-by: David Herrmann
Thanks
David
> --
&g
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David Herrmann
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Corentin Chary
>> wrote:
>>>> My BIOS provides this option, too. However, this driver does not
>&g
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
>> My BIOS provides this option, too. However, this driver does not
>> detect it on my machine. During initialization I get:
>> samsung_laptop: SABI command 0x0078 failed with completion flag 0xaa
>>
>> Maybe you can help debugging this. If th
hset on my Samsung N210. It works for me.
I've commented on a few patches about some small stuff. But it didn't
break any existing stuff / introduce regressions.
Feel free to carry this on the patches:
Tested-by: David Herrmann http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Corentin Chary
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:02:42PM +0100, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary
>>
>> What happens on boxes that don't have this type of hardware? Will the
>> LED devic
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 11 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig
> index 7f43cf8..2f7a9a
Hi Corentin
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Corentin Chary wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-samsung-laptop | 10 +++
> drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c | 82
>
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 0
samsung->handle_backlight = false;
> + }
> +#endif
>
> ret = samsung_platform_init(samsung);
> if (ret)
> --
> 1.7.5.4
My Samsung model has an intel card which previously did not support
the acpi video backlight so I needed the samsu
Hi Greg
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:50 AM, wrote:
> samsung_init() should not return success if not all devices are initialized.
> Otherwise, samsung_exit() will dereference sdev NULL pointers and others.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann
> Cc: stable
> Signed-off-by:
date_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
> {
> set_brightness(bd->props.brightness);
> @@ -796,6 +836,9 @@ static int __init samsung_init(void)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Check for stepping quirk */
> + check_for_stepping_quirk();
>
.
This patch adds detection and a non-intrusive workaround for the above issues.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann
---
Hi
This patch is originally from Jason Stubbs. See here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f=platform-samsung_laptop-add-support-for-samsung-nc210
samsung_init() should not return success if not all devices are initialized.
Otherwise, samsung_exit() will dereference sdev NULL pointers and others.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann
---
drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
19 matches
Mail list logo
