Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase "rubber hose decryption" means;
in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that
phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not
familiar with.
...sorta timely, since there is all kinds of ruckus going on in the m
Yeah, that's why TrueCrypt's ability to "hide" the volume on a device is
so awesome. The idea is, people don't realize anything is even there to
BE encrypted.
One thing I was reading about with regard to plausible deniability is to
hide your volumes inside of other files. For example, I have a jum
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mike Schwartz wrote:
> Oh, so *** that's *** what the phrase "rubber hose decryption" means;
> in some previous post (probably recently - in the parent thread?) that
> phrase was used but I thought maybe it was some FOSS tool that I was not
> familiar with.
Heh.
Y
Wouldn't one problem with your plan be is that the file size would be
different? Of course that would only matter if the person looking knew the
typical size, or the software checking the drive wasn't doing file size
checks on known files. Gotta wonder what Anti-virus software would make of
the fil
I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible
to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since
TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS
detection).
The idea, more than anything, is that I can say I have no idea what the
extra file i
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Joe wrote:
> I made the file, I didn't overwrite an existing one. Yes, it's possible
> to find the file, but it's hard to figure out what it is (since
> TrueCrypt leaves no headers although the topic the thread WAS
> detection).
>
> The idea, more than anything, is that I c
