Re: [pmacct-discussion] Reporting on additional primitives

2016-12-21 Thread Yann Belin
Hi Paolo, Sorry for the late reply, I was busy rebuilding our test lab and had to leave my Netlfow experiments aside for a while. Thanks for the your response, I understand the constraints. I will use perf counters as an aggregator for now, it will probably add some I/O load and storage needs but

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Reporting on additional primitives

2016-12-17 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Yann, You remember i was saying of the current limitations of the aggregate_primitives framework. That's it: you can add key primitives to the aggregation method but you can't add non-key ones on which, for exxample, you want to perform operations (ie. sum like in the case of bytes and packets

[pmacct-discussion] Reporting on additional primitives

2016-12-15 Thread Yann Belin
Hello, I am looking for a way to report on additional primitives with nfacct. It does by default with bytes and packets but I cannot find how to add extra fields. Am I missing something? What I want to include in reports is application performance information (rtd, packet-loss, etc.) from Cisco d