On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In the last week I tried to port seamonkey. I used the
It has already been ported, see www/seamonkey in ports.
--
Antoine
I rewrote the intro to the ports faq to try and make it slightly more
readable. See patch below. In case my mailer messes it up, I've also
put it on-line:
http://www.dickman.org/openbsd/patch.txt
http://www.dickman.org/openbsd/patch.gz
Thanks,
Daniel
Index: index.html
===
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Marc Espie wrote:
> > I agree, but only if the lab master is espie ;)
>
> That's not me, actually. I would too prefer that credit goes in the
> commit message proper.
I know it wasn't you... which was a way of saying that I'm against it
;-)
> If you put it into the Makefi
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached gtest port was from Auclair Vincent. I am OKing this apart
> > from one query. The port was developed at the Advance Computer Science
> > Epitech Lab. The lab
Anybody working on thunderbird3 port?
--
Tomasz Pajor
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached gtest port was from Auclair Vincent. I am OKing this apart
> from one query. The port was developed at the Advance Computer Science
> Epitech Lab. The lab master asked for this comment in the Makefile:
>
> # Original from auclair.vin
Hi,
The attached gtest port was from Auclair Vincent. I am OKing this apart
from one query. The port was developed at the Advance Computer Science
Epitech Lab. The lab master asked for this comment in the Makefile:
# Original from auclair.vincent and ACSEL
I would rather it goes into the commit
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:16:12 +0100
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > > tcc ;-)
> >
> > Hehe... I managed to get tcc working: the whole ucontext stuff is
> > inside an #ifdef "feature". It is possible to disable this feature, but
> > you will need to add some minor patches, because the author seem
> > to n
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:16:12 +0100
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What are you trying to port?
> > >
> > > tcc ;-)
> >
> > Hehe... I managed to get tcc working: the whole ucontext stuff is
> > inside an #ifdef "feature". It is possible to disable this feature, but
> > you will need to add
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:49:28AM +0100, Joerg Zinke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:24:21 +0100
> Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
> > > > I'm working on a port that needs the interface which
> > > > OpenBSD does not implement. Can I massage
> > > > the /usr/src/sys/compat/svr4 interface to be
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:24:21 +0100
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > > I'm working on a port that needs the interface which
> > > OpenBSD does not implement. Can I massage
> > > the /usr/src/sys/compat/svr4 interface to be used in the port, or
> > > is this a dead end?
> >
> > What are you trying t
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 01:14:22PM +0100, viq wrote:
> Here's an update to new branch - 2.1.0, with lots of fixes and
> improvements, you can read about them at
> http://www.process-one.net/en/ejabberd/release_notes/release_note_ejabberd_2.1.0
>
> Couple notes, I'll appreciate comments about them
Stuart Henderson [Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:14:58AM +] wrote:
>I think it's fine to keep the separate database flavours.
>
>This diff breaks pkg_add updates though, which are very important
>to have working - here's a new diff:
>
>- @pkgpath/@conflict markers so that pkg_add updates work
>- bette
13 matches
Mail list logo
