[PATCH] x11/py-gtk2: -mxgot workaround for mips64*

2013-10-30 Thread Donovan Watteau
Hi, x11/py-gtk2 is marked as BROKEN on alpha and mips64 (actually, it should be marked as BROKEN on mips64el too) because ".got subsegment exceeds 64K". However, building the offending library with -mxgot lets it build on mips64el. It looks like -mxgot makes it slower but, IHMO, a) it's better t

Re: [PATCH] x11/py-gtk2: -mxgot workaround for mips64*

2013-10-30 Thread Brian Callahan
On 10/30/2013 2:45 PM, Donovan Watteau wrote: Hi, x11/py-gtk2 is marked as BROKEN on alpha and mips64 (actually, it should be marked as BROKEN on mips64el too) because ".got subsegment exceeds 64K". However, building the offending library with -mxgot lets it build on mips64el. It looks like -m

Re: [PATCH] x11/py-gtk2: -mxgot workaround for mips64*

2013-10-30 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Brian Callahan devio.us> writes: > Woah. Cool! Got this built on my loongson. > One of the tests fails on loongson (I don't know what it looks like on > other archs) but I don't think that's a reason not to get this in. > ok for me if someone wants to commit. (for archive) http://gcc.gnu.org/o

Re: [PATCH] x11/py-gtk2: -mxgot workaround for mips64*

2013-11-07 Thread Donovan Watteau
Bump 2013/10/30 Donovan Watteau : > Hi, > > x11/py-gtk2 is marked as BROKEN on alpha and mips64 (actually, it > should be marked as BROKEN on mips64el too) because ".got subsegment > exceeds 64K". > > However, building the offending library with -mxgot lets it build > on mips64el. It looks like -

Re: [PATCH] x11/py-gtk2: -mxgot workaround for mips64*

2013-11-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
I think this makes sense but I would prefer if somebody using mips64* committed it :) On 2013/11/07 12:04, Donovan Watteau wrote: > Bump > > 2013/10/30 Donovan Watteau : > > Hi, > > > > x11/py-gtk2 is marked as BROKEN on alpha and mips64 (actually, it > > should be marked as BROKEN on mips64el