On 2017/12/04 11:44, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> Regarding your regression tests changes, what were the results before
> switching to py3?
It was in an earlier mail -
py2:
> > > FAILED (errors=568, failures=333)
py3:
> > FAILED (errors=563, failures=326)
On 2017/12/01 15:07, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:46:05PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/12/01 14:34, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:49:12PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > Simple version bump, here are the test results from my amd64 machi
On 2017/12/01 14:34, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:49:12PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Simple version bump, here are the test results from my amd64 machine:
> >
> > [...]
> > Ran 2242 tests in 5972.530s
> >
> > FAILED (errors=568, failures=333)
> >
> > Fee
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:49:12PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Simple version bump, here are the test results from my amd64 machine:
>
> [...]
> Ran 2242 tests in 5972.530s
>
> FAILED (errors=568, failures=333)
>
> Feedback? Any takers?
Bump, here goes the new release w