On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:29:03PM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
> disturb with one thing more:
>
> Earlier Antoine wrote this:
>
> * I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
>
> Now Antoine wro
Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
disturb with one thing more:
Earlier Antoine wrote this:
* I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
Now Antoine wrote:
All CONFIGURE_ARGS are missing.
I got confused and I hope somebody can
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
> attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
> it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
LIB_DEP
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:23:53AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got
> worried when I got very fast response on the version still having
> something to be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
>
> I will wait patiently now :)
Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got worried
when I got very fast response on the version still having something to
be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
I will wait patiently now :)
On 03/22/12 10:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Hello,
> Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
> attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
> it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
I alrea