Per previous list email from me:
---
I gathered items requiring this and was able to build them all
successfully. I also tested out at lest a couple of them by running the
actual application and found no issues.
Comments on the diff, or is it ok?
---
Edward Lopez-Acosta
On 11/20/18 5:26 P
On 2018/11/16 14:29, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Hi Landry,
>
> You are right in that I may have missed that as I slightly rushed that
> submission. My fault.
>
> What would be the right flag for 'make show' for me to see the depends? I
> thought it was rdepends but nothing came up for me.
>
I gathered items requiring this and was able to build them all
successfully. I also tested out at lest a couple of them by running the
actual application and found no issues.
Comments on the diff, or is it ok?
On 2018-11-16 00:40, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:21:51PM -0600,
Hi Landry,
You are right in that I may have missed that as I slightly rushed that
submission. My fault.
What would be the right flag for 'make show' for me to see the depends? I
thought it was rdepends but nothing came up for me.
Thank you
On November 16, 2018 6:40:43 AM UTC, Landry Breuil w
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:21:51PM -0600, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Simple version update to latest version.
> Tests and builds fine on amd64.
> Ok to merge?
Well this has some consumers and plugins.. usually it's nice to specify
which ones you've tested at build & runtime :)
Landry
Simple version update to latest version.
Tests and builds fine on amd64.
Ok to merge?
Thank you,
--
Edward Lopez-Acosta
diff --git a/devel/py-click/Makefile b/devel/py-click/Makefile
index 5048939294e..5f0ddd726c4 100644
--- a/devel/py-click/Makefile
+++ b/devel/py-click/Makefile
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@