On 7/24/2012 12:44 AM, CSS wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can do
but not limit legitimate use.
See:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/24/2012 12:44 AM, CSS wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can
do but not limit legitimate use.
See:
On 7/24/2012 2:08 AM, CSS wrote:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but I was under the impression that the
anvil limits were all enforced on a per-connection or per-IP limit. I'm
really after something that can track a particular sasl-authenticated user
and punish them (and not other
At 04:16 PM 7/23/2012, you wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the broad question, but is there any sort of best common practice
these days regarding limiting outbound email? We recently had a customer's
account compromised (not sure if it was brute-forced or keylogged) and then
the perp proceeded to use
Len Conrad:
I've been using postfwd.org for rate-limiting outbound senders,
and inbound senders and IPs, plus lots of other inbound filtering,
for a 2+ years. It killed our horrible problem of cracked passwords.
I think that dedicated tools such as postfwd and the like are the
way to go. This
We store our virtual_foo_maps in,
/etc/posfix/maps/virtual_foo_maps.pgsql
and so the (read-only) database credentials are visible in that file.
I'd like to tighten this up if possible, but I don't want to do anything
stupid.
If I'm not going about this all wrong, what can I do to prevent e.g.
On Jul 24, 2012, at 18:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
We store our virtual_foo_maps in,
/etc/posfix/maps/virtual_foo_maps.pgsql
and so the (read-only) database credentials are visible in that file.
I'd like to tighten this up if possible, but I don't want to do anything
stupid.
If I'm
On Jul 24, 2012, at 02:22, Ori Bani wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Marty Beckler wrote:
Transport next hops can have MX lookups disabled by adding [] around
the next hop.
Is it possible
On 07/24/12 12:24, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 18:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
We store our virtual_foo_maps in,
/etc/posfix/maps/virtual_foo_maps.pgsql
and so the (read-only) database credentials are visible in that file.
I'd like to tighten this up if possible, but I
On Jul 24, 2012, at 6:23 AM, Len Conrad wrote:
At 04:16 PM 7/23/2012, you wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the broad question, but is there any sort of best common practice
these days regarding limiting outbound email? We recently had a customer's
account compromised (not sure if it was
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
We store our virtual_foo_maps in,
/etc/posfix/maps/virtual_foo_maps.pgsql
and so the (read-only) database credentials are visible in that file.
I'd like to tighten this up if possible, but I don't want to do anything
Le 24/07/2012 08:37, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
On 7/24/2012 12:44 AM, CSS wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 7/23/2012 4:16 PM, CSS wrote:
I'd like to take some measures to limit what an authenticated sender can
do but not limit legitimate use.
See:
Le 24/07/2012 18:09, Michael Orlitzky a écrit :
We store our virtual_foo_maps in,
/etc/posfix/maps/virtual_foo_maps.pgsql
and so the (read-only) database credentials are visible in that file.
I'd like to tighten this up if possible, but I don't want to do anything
stupid.
If I'm not
On 07/24/2012 07:33 PM, mouss wrote:
map_directory = /var/db/postmap
cidr = cidr:${map_directory}/cidr
db = ${db_type}:${map_directory}/${db_type}
map_directory = /var/db/postmap
regex = ${regex_type}:${map_directory}/${regex_type}
sql = ${sql_type}:${map_directory}/${sql_type}
...
ls
Hi,
Recently I got request if our mail server can notify the receiver if there
is email spam and if the receiver feel it genuine email then they can
release it by them self. Does postfix can do this? Or does anyone has
implement this?
Thank you
15 matches
Mail list logo