On 2013-07-31 1:44 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-07-31 1:23 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
That*is* a problem. Postfix will slow down and eventually hang
up when a client sends too many commands that cause an
On Aug 4, 2013, at 21:08, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-07-31 1:44 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-07-31 1:23 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
That *is*
a problem. Postfix will slow
Charles Marcus:
We are set up for performance with VRFY probes and by modifying
your postfix config file so postfix will not nave a performance
issue by setting postfix option smtpd_soft_error_limit to be larger
than smtpd_hard_error_limit.
That is nonsense, as demonstrated below:
#
I hve an alias to a command defined in my /etc/aliases file, anytime I
send to it, I get this error:
This is the mail system at host mail.flintfam.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further
Does reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, when placed in the
smtpd_helo_restrictions, permit clients to HELO/EHLO
with a square-bracket enclosed dotted quad IPv4 address?
If so, is the dotted quad checked to see that it properly
represents the actual IP address of the actual current client?
Also, I
On 8/4/2013 8:06 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Does reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, when placed in the
smtpd_helo_restrictions, permit clients to HELO/EHLO
with a square-bracket enclosed dotted quad IPv4 address?
Yes.
If so, is the dotted quad checked to see that it properly
represents
On 8/4/2013 7:35 PM, Sam Flint wrote:
I hve an alias to a command defined in my /etc/aliases file, anytime I
send to it, I get this error:
This is the mail system at host mail.flintfam.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients.
In message 51ff13eb.8090...@megan.vbhcs.org,
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/4/2013 8:06 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Does reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, when placed in the
smtpd_helo_restrictions, permit clients to HELO/EHLO
with a square-bracket enclosed dotted quad IPv4
On 8/4/2013 9:54 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/4/2013 8:06 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
...
Also, I have just added all of the following to my
smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
reject_rhsbl_reverse_client multi.surbl.org
reject_rhsbl_reverse_client multi.uribl.com
On 8/4/2013 10:13 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message 51ff13eb.8090...@megan.vbhcs.org,
Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 8/4/2013 8:06 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Does reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, when placed in the
smtpd_helo_restrictions, permit clients to HELO/EHLO
Hello world,
I was configuring my postfix server for TLS support today and found out that
Postfix does not support encrypted private key.
I wonder is there any plan about adding such feature to postfix?
Best,
Yishen Miao (mys_721tx)
On 8/4/2013 10:13 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Do I need to use that if I want to perform RHSBL checks?
BTW, if you want to maximize potential hits on RHSBLs just short of
doing body checks, you may want to give Sahil Tandon's TCP server based
RHSBL header checker a spin. It grabs domains
Yishen Miao:
Hello world,
I was configuring my postfix server for TLS support today and found
out that Postfix does not support encrypted private key.
I wonder is there any plan about adding such feature to postfix?
There are no such plans. If random people can read a private key
file that
I'm trying to re-use my SSL certificate for Apache on postfix which is
encrypted. It would be convent if postfix can support that.
Also, an encrypted private key that is read-only for root sounds more secure
than a plain one in the worse problem scenarios. :-p
- Yishen
On Aug 4, 2013, at 9:54
14 matches
Mail list logo
