Am 12.5.2009 15:17 Uhr, Wietse Venema schrieb:
> Postfix stable release 2.6.0 is available. After Postfix was declared
> "complete" with version 2.3, the focus has moved towards improving
> the code/documentation, and updating it for changing environments.
I've updated the Solaris packages to 2.6
Am 20.5.2009 2:32 Uhr, Wietse Venema schrieb:
> Postfix stable release 2.6.1 fixes one defect in Milter support.
> This does not affect Postfix versions 2.5 and earlier.
The Solaris packages are updated and available on
http://ihsan.dogan.ch/postfix/ .
Ihsan
--
ih...@dogan.ch http:
inet:[127.0.0.1],[1.2.3.4]:41001
Is such a setup possible with Postfix?
Regards,
Ihsan Dogan
--
ih...@dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with^M
>> milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),^M
>> I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.^M
>> ^M
>> I was expecting something something like
Am 12.6.2009 17:50 Uhr, Noel Jones schrieb:
Is such a setup possible with Postfix?^M
>>> Not supported. Eror control is limited to milter_default_action.
>> I see.
>>
>> If I specify "milter_default_action = reject" and there is an error with
>> the milter daemon, Postfix will give a 554. Wha
Hello,
While running a few test I've noticed, that Postfix does not cache any
LDAP queries. As far I can see, I can limit the number of simultaneous
queries with proxymap, but is it possible to cache the LDAP queries?
I've noticed that according to ldap_table(5) the cache statement was
removed. I
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> No. LDAP supports robust distributed caching via replication. If you
> want local caching on a MTA, field an LDAP replica on the MTA or
> dedicate a suitable replica on a nearby machine to the MTA.
>
> LDAP caching in the LDAP library was buggy, and has poor semantics.
>
Hi,
I've noticed, that my Postfix installation does select in some
caes (especially if Postfix is running on both ends)
AECDH-AES256-SHA instead of ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The
receiving Postfix does support ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 and
connections with that cipher are possible.
But if Pos
Hi Viktor,
On Saturday, 02 Aug 2014 15:32 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I've noticed, that my Postfix installation does select in some
> > caes (especially if Postfix is running on both ends)
> > AECDH-AES256-SHA instead of ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The
> > receiving Postfix does support E
