Uh, that would be me...
Ted Roche wrote:
>On 1/9/07, Matthew Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>M$ makes a big stink about using VFP on a Linux platform, right?
>>
>>
>>
>
>No, somebody (and it wasn't Whil) made a big stink about a 'Softie
>trying to lay down a chilling effect on Whil
On 1/9/07, Matthew Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> M$ makes a big stink about using VFP on a Linux platform, right?
>
There's a summary with a number of links here, too:
http://www.associateddata.co.uk/VFPLinux.htm
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
On 1/9/07, Matthew Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> M$ makes a big stink about using VFP on a Linux platform, right?
>
No, somebody (and it wasn't Whil) made a big stink about a 'Softie
trying to lay down a chilling effect on Whil doing a demo on Linux for
Windows. Stink rolled uphill and got
On Jan 9, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Matthew Jarvis wrote:
> M$ makes a big stink about using VFP on a Linux platform, right?
Wrong. They have no problem with running VFP on anything. You can
develop to your heart's content on Linux.
They have a problem with distributing the runtime lib
Hey Matthew,
I'm one of the Advocates for VFP9 on Crossover Office (cxOffice) by
Codeweavers. cxOffice is a commercial wrapper for the WINE project that
makes it easier to install Windows software under Linux and the Mac.
Unfortunately VFP stopped working in cxOffice in version 4.2 but I keep
Matthew Jarvis wrote:
> So here's a question for ya...
>
> M$ makes a big stink about using VFP on a Linux platform, right?
>
> But Codeweaver is a company that does pretty much nothing but see to it
> that certain apps run on the Linux platform
>
> For example, MS Access in various flavours i
6 matches
Mail list logo