[protobuf] Re: Issue 628 in protobuf: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c

2014-06-17 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 628 by xiaof...@google.com: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=628 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

[protobuf] Issue 628 in protobuf: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c

2014-04-05 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 628 by robert.e...@gmail.com: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=628 Hi, The protobuf-c project has moved from http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/ to https

[protobuf] Re: Issue 597 in protobuf: Add sbt-cppp to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please

2014-01-21 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 597 by xiaof...@google.com: Add sbt-cppp to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=597 Done. Added to the "Other utilities" section. -- You received this message because this

[protobuf] Issue 597 in protobuf: Add sbt-cppp to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please

2014-01-18 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 597 by pop.a...@gmail.com: Add sbt-cppp to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=597 I recently open-sourced sbt-cppp, a [Sbt](http://www.scala-sbt.org) Plugin for

Re: [protobuf] Please add 'Wire' to ThirdPartyAddOns page

2013-10-25 Thread Feng Xiao
ml>library on the > https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns<http://ThirdPartyAddOns> > page. > The Wire repo is at https://github.com/square/wire. Wire is meant for use > with Android or other constrained Java environments and is Apache-licensed. > Thanks, > >

[protobuf] Please add 'Wire' to ThirdPartyAddOns page

2013-10-25 Thread Dan Rice
Hi - Please add a link to the Wire<http://corner.squareup.com/2013/08/introducing-wire.html>library on the https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns<http://ThirdPartyAddOns> page. The Wire repo is at https://github.com/square/wire. Wire is meant for use with Andr

[protobuf] Re: Issue 540 in protobuf: Add protoc-gen-haxe to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please

2013-08-05 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 540 by xiaof...@google.com: Add protoc-gen-haxe to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=540 Done. Thanks. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

[protobuf] Issue 540 in protobuf: Add protoc-gen-haxe to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please

2013-08-04 Thread protobuf
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 540 by pop.a...@gmail.com: Add protoc-gen-haxe to ThirdPartyAddOns wiki page, please http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=540 I recently implement protocol buffer compiler and runtime in Haxe. The project

Re: ThirdPartyAddOns

2009-07-02 Thread Kenton Varda
What's the difference between all these links? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Chris Kuklewicz wrote: > > Kenton, > > Could you change the link on the > > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns > > page for Haskell from > > http://darcs.ha

Re: ThirdPartyAddOns

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Kuklewicz
Kenton, Could you change the link on the http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns page for Haskell from http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers/ to http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers2/ And if there is room can you also add http

Re: ThirdPartyAddOns

2009-07-02 Thread Marc Gravell
> Done and done. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf

Re: ThirdPartyAddOns

2009-07-02 Thread Kenton Varda
Done and done. I didn't know protobuf-net had RPC or I would have listed it on the RPC implementations page some time ago. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Marc Gravell wrote: > > I notice the replacement ThirdPartyAddOns page; can you please also > include protobuf-net in the R

ThirdPartyAddOns

2009-07-02 Thread Marc Gravell
I notice the replacement ThirdPartyAddOns page; can you please also include protobuf-net in the RPC section? It provides 2 separate RPC implementations (WCF-based and bespoke). Also; I wonder if it might help to clarify (at the top) which languages are provided in the official codebase; then the