On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 03:37:01PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > Strange. Build didn't fail for me, but maybe I have not tried with the
> > option to build this docu thing. I will have a second look into it
> > tomorrow. I guess t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Strange. Build didn't fail for me, but maybe I have not tried with the
> option to build this docu thing. I will have a second look into it
> tomorrow. I guess this means changing the patch instead of dropping
> it?
Or make a new pa
Hei hei,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:45:38PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> This last hunk was not integrated upstream, so doc2gih fails to link
> because of missing libraries.
Strange. Build didn't fail for me, but maybe I have not tried with the
option to build this docu thing. I will have a s
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 05:09:03PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl
> ---
> rules/gnuplot.in | 49 -
> rules/gnuplot.make | 21 ++---
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 05:09:02PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl
> ---
> ...ld-documentation-generator-tools-with-CC_.patch | 99
>
> ...DFLAGS-when-building-the-documentation-ge.patch | 30 --
> patches/gnuplot-4.4.3/autogen.sh
