On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:08 +0100, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to
favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).
However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete
and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmf
Hi All,
There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to
favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).
However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete
and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to
publish a spec that conflict
I support this publication.
- Maciej
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on
> the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the spec:
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/
I also support.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I support this.
>
> / Jonas
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow
> wrote:
> > Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work
> on
> > the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a
I support this.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on
> the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the
> spec:
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overvie
Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work
on the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of
the spec:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM
Core. If
