On 12/6/2010 1:08 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick
one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose
the next step . Any volunteers?
I am responding to feedback on these
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> On 12/6/2010 1:08 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> > > Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick
> > > one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose
> > > the
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> Since Hixie is active on HTML, perhaps someone else is willing to pick
> one of these LCs and to review the issues, bugs, diffs, etc. and propose
> the next step . Any volunteers?
I am responding to feedback on these specs, just not on the schedule
OK, so coming back to the what's next for these 3 LC documents question
[Head] ...
All of these specs have a Bugzilla component for issue and comment
tracking, all are included in the WHATWG issue tracker at [Issues], all
of the specs have changed since their LC was published and all of the
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> Ian - regarding the following specs that ended LC on June 30, do you
> have some type of comment tracking document, like you did for XBL2
> [XBL2-DoC]?
I do not believe I kept track of e-mail feedback, but the history of
feedback filed through Bugz
Ian - regarding the following specs that ended LC on June 30, do you
have some type of comment tracking document, like you did for XBL2
[XBL2-DoC]?
1. Server-sent Events
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-eventsource-20091222/
2. Web Storage
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-webstorage-20091222/
3. Web
