On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 16:43 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2020 11:23:22 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 12:42 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 January 2020 09:21:31 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > Would you be willing to document the codec negotiation process
On Tuesday 17 March 2020 11:23:22 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 12:42 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 January 2020 09:21:31 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 19:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > My A2DP patch series which adds suppor
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 12:42 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2020 09:21:31 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 19:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
> > > review state, but Tanu abo
On Sunday 12 January 2020 09:21:31 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 19:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
> > review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
> > with usage of
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 09:21 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> I'm trying to think this from the user's point of view. The proposed UI
> seems to be that first the sub-profile is chosen (activated) and then
> the codec parameters can be chosen.
I meant "first the profile is chosen", not sub-profile.
-
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 19:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
> review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
> with usage of PA profiles for selecting A2DP codec. Because nobody for
> last year
On 08.01.20 12:35, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 07 January 2020 21:57:40 Georg Chini wrote:
On 07.01.20 19:37, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
with usage o
On Tuesday 07 January 2020 21:57:40 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 07.01.20 19:37, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
> > review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
> > with usage of PA profiles for s
On 07.01.20 19:37, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
with usage of PA profiles for selecting A2DP codec. Because nobody for
last year come up with another opti
Hello!
My A2DP patch series which adds support for more A2DP codecs is still in
review state, but Tanu about year ago wrote that do not like my proposal
with usage of PA profiles for selecting A2DP codec. Because nobody for
last year come up with another option how to solve this problem and
becaus
10 matches
Mail list logo