Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread Ohad Levy
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Julian Simpson wrote: > > Foreman already has integration on its side for extlookup (it's in trunk or >> something) as soon as Julian and I finish making the backend pluggable it >> will be able to integrate easily into foreman. >> > > It should be very simple to a

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread Julian Simpson
> > Julian Simpson is working on making the backends pluggable so we should > have > something soon. > > Foreman already has integration on its side for extlookup (it's in trunk or > something) as soon as Julian and I finish making the backend pluggable it > will be able to integrate easily into fo

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread Ohad Levy
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > This might be a start to some sort of evolved smart node idea (that we > could stick in Dashboard and also build a CLI tool to) that could > support the concept of variable inheritance. So not just define what > machines are webservers (ra

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread Michael DeHaan
> Did you look at extlookup? Cos thats what it does. Not enough apparently ... I thought it did something completely different. Sweet! We need to merge more of the ideas in ext with core, for sure. Seems like it would be easy to tweak to do multiple data sources (like DBs/NoSQL). --Michael -

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread R.I.Pienaar
hello, > > This might be a start to some sort of evolved smart node idea (tha we > > could stick in Dashboard and also build a CLI tool to) that could > > support the concept of variable inheritance. So not just define what > > machines are webservers (rather than what webservers are what machin

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-14 Thread Joe McDonagh
Michael DeHaan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nat wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have got puppet set up and running at our main office with no >> issues. >> We are using an external node classifier instead of directly creating >> node definition files. >> >> We would like to manage our remote o

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-12 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nat wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have got puppet set up and running at our main office with no >> issues. >> We are using an external node classifier instead of directly creating >> node definition files. >> >> W

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-12 Thread Michael DeHaan
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nat wrote: > Hi, > > We have got puppet set up and running at our main office with no > issues. > We are using an external node classifier instead of directly creating > node definition files. > > We would like to manage our remote offices using puppet also. A litt

Re: [Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-11 Thread Joe McDonagh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nat wrote: > Hi, > > We have got puppet set up and running at our main office with no > issues. > We are using an external node classifier instead of directly creating > node definition files. > > We would like to manage our remote offices using pupp

[Puppet Users] satellite sites management

2010-02-11 Thread Nat
Hi, We have got puppet set up and running at our main office with no issues. We are using an external node classifier instead of directly creating node definition files. We would like to manage our remote offices using puppet also. A little about our set up. From our main site we have VPN links o