Re: [pve-devel] pvetest updates and RC ISO installer

No, if you enable nested virtualization. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Daniel Hunsaker wrote: > OpenVZ would probably work just fine, but KVM would be slow, at best. The > rest should function normally. > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015, 19:09 Lindsay Mathieson > wrote: > >> >> On 31 January 2015 at 0

Re: [pve-devel] pvetest updates and RC ISO installer

On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:38:55 AM Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > I presume virtualisation wouldn't work, but I should be able to test the > > zfs storage with it? > > Yes, but there are problems with virtio disks. It works great if > you use lsi scsi for disks. Thanks, good to know _

Re: [pve-devel] zfs alloc_image,

hi, Martin I have report this bug on bugzilla, It’s here: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595 Thanks. lyt_yudi lyt_y...@icloud.com > 在 2015年2月2日，下午4:31，Martin Maurer 写道： > > Hi, > > thanks for reporting, can you file a bug on https://bugzilla.proxmox.com >

Re: [pve-devel] why disk count less than 6?

ok, got it! Thanks again! lyt_yudi lyt_y...@icloud.com > 在 2015年2月2日，下午4:43，Dietmar Maurer 写道： > > >> hi, PVE Developers >>why disk count less than 6 ? > > There is simple no room on the gui to select an unlimited amount of disk. > (But feel free to send a patch if you have a soluti

[pve-devel] [PATCH] ZfsPoolPlugin: fix add disks

now it is possible add disk to an vm on rpool Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link --- PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm |8 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm index 10da7f7..629802e 100644 --- a/PVE/Storage/Z

Re: [pve-devel] why disk count less than 6?

> hi, PVE Developers > why disk count less than 6 ? There is simple no room on the gui to select an unlimited amount of disk. (But feel free to send a patch if you have a solution for that problem.) With the current solution, you are able to install any zfs RAID level. Adding additional dis

[pve-devel] [PATCH 2/2] next_migrate_port: higher port range - all other ranges are 100 ports

Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe --- data/PVE/Tools.pm |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/data/PVE/Tools.pm b/data/PVE/Tools.pm index 1049864..4ff1e8f 100644 --- a/data/PVE/Tools.pm +++ b/data/PVE/Tools.pm @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ sub next_unused_port { } sub next_

[pve-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Fix next_unused_port already bin detection

unsecure migration does not use localhost to bind to. Instead it uses a specific IP on the node. As we don't know that IP in this part of the code the only chance to check for a possible already existing bind is to bind to all IPs. Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe --- data/PVE/Tools.pm |2 +-

Re: [pve-devel] why disk count less than 6?

Hi, this is limited on 6 disk, because of the gui installer. but you can add more disk later by useing the CLI. Rereads On 02/02/2015 06:24 AM, lyt_yudi wrote: hi, PVE Developers why disk count less than 6 ? why can't select all disk to zfs_raid_setup ? …… sub get_zfs_raid_setup {

Re: [pve-devel] pvetest updates and RC ISO installer

> I presume virtualisation wouldn't work, but I should be able to test the > zfs storage with it? Yes, but there are problems with virtio disks. It works great if you use lsi scsi for disks. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pv

Re: [pve-devel] zfs alloc_image,

Hi, thanks for reporting, can you file a bug on https://bugzilla.proxmox.com? Martin On 02.02.2015 06:08, lyt_yudi wrote: hi, PVE Developers here is a bug? # cat /etc/pve/qemu-server/101.conf balloon: 4096 bootdisk: virtio0 cores: 4 cpuunits: 15 hotplug: disk,network,usb,memory,c