Phil,
I wonder how this slipped through.. sigh. I am really terrible at applying
patches :(
I will try to investigate the ncache issues with the mpi program later
today. But how about adding mount options (and parsing code in pvfs2) in
the pvfs2tab file like "noacache, noncache" to disable per-fs m
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:34:05PM -0500, Murali Vilayannur wrote:
> Hey Rob,
> Shall we first try to diagnose the problem a little bit?
> Can you describe the problem a little bit more?
Ok, sure:
Some background:
You can specify a ROMIO hint (cb_config_list) that lists machines (as
returned by
I doubt that this is the problem, but I should mention that I although
the main ncache patch was accepted, we are still missing the sys-rename
update in trunk (I just noticed Friday). It is the second of the two
patches mentioned in this thread:
http://www.beowulf-underground.org/pipermail/pv
Hey Rob,
Shall we first try to diagnose the problem a little bit?
Can you describe the problem a little bit more?
Thanks,
Murali
> Hey gang
>
> One of the ROMIO tests (noncontig_coll2) started failing around the
> time we comitted the revamped ncache. If I disable the ncache by
> setting NCACHE_D
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:27:39PM -0500, Robert Latham wrote:
> Hey gang
>
> One of the ROMIO tests (noncontig_coll2) started failing around the
> time we comitted the revamped ncache. If I disable the ncache by
> setting NCACHE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MSECS to zero, the test passes again.
>
> Sam and
Hey gang
One of the ROMIO tests (noncontig_coll2) started failing around the
time we comitted the revamped ncache. If I disable the ncache by
setting NCACHE_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MSECS to zero, the test passes again.
Sam and I have a couple solutions, but none of them are satsifying
given we need to c
