On Monday 10 June 2013 16:44:27 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> Even though it may seem not to help as well as before,
> the TextChas still prevent lots of attempts. The logs are
> full of TextCha failures.
>
> The ratio of success to failures in the current log file
> (which was started yesterday at 6am
On 10.06.2013 15:15, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On Friday 22 March 2013 12:19:05 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 20.03.2013 15:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:08 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
If we can't get things under control, we will have to start
using such a group and disable pub
On Friday 22 March 2013 12:19:05 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 20.03.2013 15:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:08 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >> If we can't get things under control, we will have to start
> >> using such a group and disable public editing of pages :-(
> >
> > FWIW, we'v
On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:19 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>Did this have an effect on the number of editors of the wiki ?
It probably did, but it's hard to gauge. It's not like we had a ton of
non-spam editors previously. We never denied anybody write access if they
asked though.
>The usual complaint
On 20.03.2013 15:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:08 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> If we can't get things under control, we will have to start
>> using such a group and disable public editing of pages :-(
>
> FWIW, we've long had this policy on the Mailman wiki. It was the only
>
On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:08 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>If we can't get things under control, we will have to start
>using such a group and disable public editing of pages :-(
FWIW, we've long had this policy on the Mailman wiki. It was the only
successful way to control spam. Sign up is open (and
On 20.03.2013 09:44, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 19.03.2013 09:14, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 18.03.2013 19:58, Paul Boddie wrote:
>>> On Monday 18 March 2013 19:00:37 Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're getting a fair am
On 20.03.2013 08:33, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Paul Boddie wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:30:13 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>>
>>> I've added a new set of textchas to the Python wiki.
>>
>> Thanks to both of you for configuring the wiki and improving the text
On 19.03.2013 09:14, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 18.03.2013 19:58, Paul Boddie wrote:
>> On Monday 18 March 2013 19:00:37 Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
Hello,
We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:30:13 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >
> > I've added a new set of textchas to the Python wiki.
>
> Thanks to both of you for configuring the wiki and improving the textcha
> questions. This makes it a lot easier and more
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:30:13 M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> I've added a new set of textchas to the Python wiki.
Thanks to both of you for configuring the wiki and improving the textcha
questions. This makes it a lot easier and more rewarding to keep maintaining
the wiki content.
Paul
__
On 19.03.2013 09:14, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 18.03.2013 19:58, Paul Boddie wrote:
>> On Monday 18 March 2013 19:00:37 Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
Hello,
We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
On 18.03.2013 19:58, Paul Boddie wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 19:00:37 Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
>>> administrative privileges check that the text
On Monday 18 March 2013 21:56:04 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Does MoinMoin support moderated edits by new users?
Not out of the box, at least to my knowledge, but I have written an extension
that puts edits in an approval queue for each page if the contributor is not
part of the approved contribu
Does MoinMoin support moderated edits by new users?
--
anatoly t.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
> administrative privileges check that the textcha feature is enabled and has
> been give
On 18/03/2013 18:00, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
We've been seeing the same development on the Jython wiki. I guess
they just realized that the Python wiki will likely get them
even more Google juice:
http://wiki.python.org/jython/RecentChanges
Of course, ideas as welcome :-)
I've had success with
On Monday 18 March 2013 19:00:37 Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
> > administrative privileges check that the textcha feature is enabled and
> > has been giv
On 18.03.2013 19:03, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * M.-A. Lemburg :
>
>> We've been seeing the same development on the Jython wiki. I guess
>> they just realized that the Python wiki will likely get them
>> even more Google juice:
>>
>> http://wiki.python.org/jython/RecentChanges
>>
>> Unfortunatel
* M.-A. Lemburg :
> We've been seeing the same development on the Jython wiki. I guess
> they just realized that the Python wiki will likely get them
> even more Google juice:
>
> http://wiki.python.org/jython/RecentChanges
>
> Unfortunately, the wiki spam appears to from real humans,
> so textc
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
> administrative privileges check that the textcha feature is enabled and has
> been given a set of effective questions?
You can see that it is enabled by visi
On 18.03.2013 18:51, Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're getting a fair amount of spam on the Python Wiki. Can someone with
> administrative privileges check that the textcha feature is enabled and has
> been given a set of effective questions?
We've been seeing the same development on the
21 matches
Mail list logo
