Al Sweigart wrote:
Oh, also, we should keep the Pygame logo. It's familiar branding, and it
doesn't look bad at all.
I second that. The old site design has an air of
playfulness about it that the new one currently lacks.
It looks bland and doesn't convey that pygame is
about having *fun*.
--
G
Here's my 2c:
Too much information.
We have horizontal and vertical scrolling, it's too much.
It doesn't tell you what Pygame is, i have to scroll right to get that,
very unintuitive.
Because of the amount of information and the number of columns, any
particularly informative posts are taller tha
I have to recommend against the horizontal scrolling and column usage. And
having to maintain two separate versions of the web page almost always
turns out to be a bad idea: it doubles your workload for updates. If you
want to go that route, I'd recommend the "low fi" version just be the
mobile ver
It's certainly a very unusual design. I could imagine horizontal scrolling
working, but I think having both horizontal and vertical scrolling is a bad
idea - it's too easy to get lost, and I feel like I want to zoom out to get
a full overview of the site. It also makes it tricky to use the site wit
I think the site is 100 times better than it was before, Im liking the white
space (very pythonic).
Agree with what others are saying, horizontal scrolling is not ideal and the
navigation controls are made useless once you start vert scrolling, Id get
rid of it altogether.
Id reduce information on
i agree with Al. But scrolling in any direction is ok.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Bartosz Debski wrote:
> HI, I must say horizontal scroll is somewhat annoying. I would go with
> rule less is more, but that's my opinion.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:49 AM, René Dudfield wrote
HI, I must say horizontal scroll is somewhat annoying. I would go with rule
less is more, but that's my opinion.
Cheers
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:49 AM, René Dudfield wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Since you used five NOs, I thought I'd break my own new rule of not
> talking about future features and le
Hi Greg,
Since you used five NOs, I thought I'd break my own new rule of not talking
about future features and let you know there is also going to be a 'lofi'
version with a more conventional approach(think old craigslist level of
interface). The current website is also going to keep working in t
