On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:24:16 +0800
James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Finlay wrote:
Hi James,
Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
encountered some problems that I would
Where is the bugzilla URL and how do I say this in bugzilla speak:
Why does checking to see if a GtkTreeItem is a subtree
(with item.subtree != None) result in a segfault?
Here is a a version of the _wrap_gtk_tree_item_get_subtree source
that fixes my problem.
Remove foo and use return
Jon Nelson wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:24:16 +0800
James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Finlay wrote:
Hi James,
Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
encountered some problems
Jon Nelson wrote:
Here's a patch for the NULL-pointer dereference problem with
GtkTreeItem.subtree
*Please* either incorporate this or identical functionality,
otherwise using GtkTreeItem.subtree to test if a GtkTreeitem
is a subtree is fraught with sigsegs.
This bug is fixed in CVS.
James.
Hi Jon,
This is one of the porblems I encountered as well. I believe the fix needs to be
applied in the generate/gktlists.defs file. However, it would also require a patch to
the generate/generate.py file as well. I'll file a bug report on this with those
changes.
FYI the patches I have:
---
There is now a pygtk-1.99.5 tarball up on ftp.gnome.org at:
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/earthquake/sources/pygtk/pygtk-1.99.5.tar.gz
(with diffs to previous versions). The majority of the work in this
release was done by Skip and Matt. You will need python = 2.2b1 to
compile this release
Hi James,
Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
encountered some problems that I would report if there is still some
development activity.
Thanks
John
