On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 23:10 +1300, John C Barstow wrote:
ANY feedback would be helpful
I have no technical feedback to provide, actually.
Anyway, I want to stress that those who I talk about pygtk will always
complain about the convolution of tree/list widgets it provides.
Powerful,
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 13:46 +0200, Fabien COUTANT wrote:
As a GTK 1.2/2.x and PyGtk 0.6/2.x programmer, I think it's worse than
that.
I think the problem about the list widget lies in Gtk, not in PyGtk.
Once upon a time was the CList widget. It was limited but simple and
practical,
and
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 11:51 +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some feedback on the API itself at this
stage would be really helpful.
ANY feedback would be helpful. I know everyone has done similar stuff
before; I'm just trying to make it super-simple. I can take criticism,
really.
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 23:10 +1300, John C Barstow wrote:
ANY feedback would be helpful
I have no technical feedback to provide, actually.
Anyway, I want to stress that those who I talk about pygtk will always
complain about the convolution of tree/list widgets it provides.
Powerful, elegant,
Quoting Roberto Cavada [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 23:10 +1300, John C Barstow wrote:
ANY feedback would be helpful
I have no technical feedback to provide, actually.
Anyway, I want to stress that those who I talk about pygtk will always
complain about the convolution of
