John Finlay wrote:
>Hi Jon,
>
>This is one of the porblems I encountered as well. I believe the fix needs to be
>applied in the generate/gktlists.defs file. However, it would also require a patch to
>the generate/generate.py file as well. I'll file a bug report on this with those
>changes.
>
PyGT
Hi Jon,
This is one of the porblems I encountered as well. I believe the fix needs to be
applied in the generate/gktlists.defs file. However, it would also require a patch to
the generate/generate.py file as well. I'll file a bug report on this with those
changes.
FYI the patches I have:
--- ge
Jon Nelson wrote:
>Here's a patch for the NULL-pointer dereference problem with
>GtkTreeItem.subtree
>
>
>*Please* either incorporate this or identical functionality,
>otherwise using GtkTreeItem.subtree to test if a GtkTreeitem
>is a subtree is fraught with sigsegs.
>
This bug is fixed in CVS.
Jon Nelson wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:24:16 +0800
>"James Henstridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>John Finlay wrote:
>>
>>>Hi James,
>>>
>>>Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
>>>source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
>>>enco
Here's a patch for the NULL-pointer dereference problem with
GtkTreeItem.subtree
*Please* either incorporate this or identical functionality,
otherwise using GtkTreeItem.subtree to test if a GtkTreeitem
is a subtree is fraught with sigsegs.
--
Jon Nelson\|/ \|/ Gort,
[E
> Where is the bugzilla URL and how do I say this in bugzilla speak:
>
> "Why does checking to see if a GtkTreeItem is a subtree
> (with item.subtree != None) result in a segfault?"
Here is a a version of the _wrap_gtk_tree_item_get_subtree source
that "fixes" my problem.
Remove foo and use re
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 17:24:16 +0800
"James Henstridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Finlay wrote:
>
> >Hi James,
> >
> >Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
> >source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
> >encountered some problems
John Finlay wrote:
>Hi James,
>
>Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
>source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
>encountered some problems that I would report if there is still some
>development activity.
>
I should probably make anoth
Hi James,
Is there any maintenance effort being done on the old pygtk (0.6.8)
source base or is it considered complete? Just wondering because I have
encountered some problems that I would report if there is still some
development activity.
Thanks
John
_
