Jason Voegele wrote:
I answered this in my reply to Giovanni. My QThread derivatives are in
Python. From what I've read so far, that sounds like bad news. :(
Well, only in so much as you should spawn of processes to do this
work... Encoding sounds like something that should be pretty easily
Toby Dickenson wrote:
* Startup time while your modules are imported. Plan to have a splash screen
with a progress bar :-(
How do you do this with PyQt?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/496746/
The RestrictedPython package is probably a more robust and maintained
version of this...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_
Neal Becker wrote:
If the pyqt examples did not use *, and if you could import a useful enough
subset without doing that, I'd agree. If the suggestion is to explicitly
qualify everything, I don't think that's reasonable.
Yes, python, well know for believing that implicit is better than
expli
Phil Thompson wrote:
This has been discussed thousands of times and it starts getting
annoying.
Yes, it is annoying that all the example code continues to be in a form
that confuses users trying to learn PyQt.
*None* of the PyQt4 examples uses star imports.
Hmmm, apologies then, must have b
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On mer, 2009-01-07 at 09:26 +, Chris Withers wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:19:50 -0500, Neal Becker
wrote:
A bit nasty, since I see (and follow) lots of examples that say:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
This redefines the builtin hex.
Check the
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:19:50 -0500, Neal Becker
wrote:
A bit nasty, since I see (and follow) lots of examples that say:
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
This redefines the builtin hex.
Check the Roadmap.
Appending a _ just to make an unpleasant style of programming work seem
David Boddie wrote:
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/sip/intro
IS there no way to package up an application such that you don't need to
seperately install python, pyqt4 and then the app?
In theory:
http://www.diotavelli.net/PyQtWiki/Deploying_PyQt_Applications
Cool, thanks for
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Get it from your distribution under linux or use the ready-made
installer from Phil for windows. I don't know what the state on MacOSX
is. In worst case you're fetching sip+pyqt4
what's sip?
- How do I package an app up that uses PyQt4 as a double-click-installer
for
Phil Thompson wrote:
PyPI is a PIA to use when you are not using eggs.
Okay, let me rephrase: how come PyQt4 isn't available as an egg?
(for the record, I hate eggs, but the python community has adopted them,
so I'm just attempting to put up and shut up. zc.buildout does offer
some analgesic f
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
- how come PyQt4 isn't on PyPI? (Nowadays I'm used to just specifying
packages as egg requirements in a buildout.cfg
(http://buildout.zope.org/) but I guess I can't do that with PyQt4?)
Because so far there's little interest in that I think, plus PyQt4
doesn't use dist
Phil Thompson wrote:
That seems weird to put it politely. I would have thought they both had
the same interfaces?
It's not a technical limitation. It is to prevent people developing a
commercial product with the GPL version and then switching to the
commercial version at the last minute. The Py
Hey All,
Apologies for the newbie questions, I'm still trying to decide what gui
toolkit I want to use and so would like to give Qt4 a go. Everything I
do is in python, so that leads me to PyQt4 ;-)
I'm currently doing entirely open soruce development on Windows.
However, I wouldn't like to
Output is as follows:
PyKDE version 3.11.3
---
Python include directory is /usr/include/python2.4
Python version is 2.4.0
sip version is 4.2.1 (4.2.1)
Qt directory is /usr/lib/qt-3.3
Qt version is 3.3.4
PyQt directory is /usr/share/sip
PyQt version is 3.14.1 (3.14.1)
KDE b
14 matches
Mail list logo
