Dan Riti added the comment:
Agreed Ezio, I've updated the patch to include the change to
Doc/library/io.rst:readlines.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29868/demote-readlines-v3.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Dan Riti added the comment:
Added a new version of the patch to incorporate Ezio's comment!
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29859/demote-readlines-v2.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Dan Riti added the comment:
Looks great, thanks Antoine! =)
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15480>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Dan Riti added the comment:
Antoine, I just filled one out maybe 2 hours ago (I'm at a CPython sprint in
Boston).
https://secure.echosign.com/public/viewAgreement?aid=T8FLXZG5LX3W2N&eid=T8GPRVI62IXF2Y&;
--
___
Python t
Dan Riti added the comment:
After reading the comments, I generated a patch that does the following:
- Reorganize to present `for line in f:` as the first approach for reading
lines. I refrained from saying it's the *preferred* approach, however I can add
that if desired.
- Reorgani
Dan Riti added the comment:
So I figured I'd give this one a shot...generated a patch to remove TYPE_INT64.
Tests seem to pass, but please provide any guidance if I did something wrong!
Thanks.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +dan.riti
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29818/mar
Dan Riti added the comment:
I second akuchling's link suggestion, as it seems to be the most up to date
openSUSE packaging resource.
I have generated a patch to update the link.
Also, it seems this link is also broken in the 2.7 documentation:
http://docs.python.org/2/using/unix
Dan Riti added the comment:
Reproduced the issue and generated a patch following Kyle's documented
approach.
Please note that this patch addresses the link problem, but does not address
the style issue. Thanks.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +Dan.Riti
Added file: http://bugs.pytho