Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Sure, the repo can go private if deemed necessary. I still think this is not a
big deal anyway.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11575
Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com added the comment:
Tom Pinckney thinks it's a big deal. I suspect he might be interested
to know why you think it's not. We are entitled to our own opinions
about privacy, but the request at hand concerns another person's
privacy. He's the one you need to
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
As I said, I'm not opposed to make the repo private. I don't need to convince
anyone. You sound like you're trying to change my opinion here.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Ok, the repo is now private.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11575
___
Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com added the comment:
I interpreted not a big deal to mean that having addresses exposed
was not a big deal. Too many pronouns perhaps.
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Your interpretation was correct indeed. It's an email address we're talking
about here, which is necessarily a public bit of information, not a private one
like a Social Security or credit card number.
Anyway, the repo is now private, so
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Why should we have this file served on the web itself? Cannot it be on server
outside of www ( or any directory which is getting served). I would vote for
this.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The question is not why, it is how. This file is part of the scripts used
to migrate from svn to hg. These files themselves were maintained in an hg
repository (it could have been an svn repository), for obvious practical
reasons. And that
New submission from Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
The python.org postmaster received this email today:
From: Tom Pinckney thomaspinckn...@gmail.com
To: postmas...@python.org
Subject: public email addresses
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:03:21 -0400
X-Spambayes-Classification:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
I've asked the website team to see if they can adjust the robots.txt
file
Is there a problem with the robots.txt? It already disallows all robots.
If Google ignores the robots.txt, then someone should complain to Google.
--
nosy:
10 matches
Mail list logo