[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Ned Deily
Ned Deily added the comment: For the as-yet unreleased changes for Issue7425, I added some test cases for pydoc -k (apropos) and chose a keyword of "nothing", a keyword which has no hits in the standard library. Unfortunately, you both installed third-party packages that *do* have hits for "

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset e5f2c04055a2 by Ned Deily in branch '2.7': Issue #13861: Prevent test_apropos* test case failures in test_pydoc. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e5f2c04055a2 New changeset 5eb47e1732a0 by Ned Deily in branch '3.2': Issue #13861: Prevent test_aprop

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: Adding Ned, who refactored these tests, to nosy. -- nosy: +ned.deily ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah added the comment: Eric Araujo wrote: > docutils is the first package that???s found in my user site-packages; > can you tell if your Crypto package is in that same location? The package is here: /usr/local/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Crypto/SelfTest/Protocol/test_AllOrNothing.py

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: I have the same one on Debian testing: == FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest) -- Traceback (mo

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-01-25 Thread Stefan Krah
New submission from Stefan Krah : test_pydoc fails on Ubuntu Lucid: == FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest) -- Traceback (most