[issue3580] failures in test_os

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- assignee: pitrou -> ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Is this reproduced on modern Python versions? -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I don't know. Anyway, it is not really a Python bug, so I suggest we close it. -- resolution: -> invalid status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Changes by Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- title: failures test_os -> failures in test_os ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Hirokazu Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Maybe will first test failure be fixed by attached patch? Sorry, this is my bug in issue1709599. :-( -- keywords: +patch nosy: +ocean-city Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11140/fix_test_1565150.patch ___

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: No, it doesn't fix it. But I've just tried manually, and GetVolumeInformation() returns "NTFS" for the Samba share. Apparently this is a Samba "feature" to work with Windows NT. :-) See http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-April/065027.ht

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Raghuram Devarakonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > The other failure is trivial, I've fixed it in r65780. #1709112 has been reported earlier in relation to pagefile.sys. Your patch addresses at least part of the problem there. I wonder if that issue can be closed. -- nosy: +d

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: According to the aforementioned bug report, we should also add a test for e.winerror == 5. Chances are that other cases will arise one day or another... Since the purpose of the test is, allegedly, to "Verify that an open file can be stat'ed"

[issue3580] failures in test_os

Raghuram Devarakonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the purpose of the test is, allegedly, to "Verify that an open > file can be stat'ed", it may be simpler to create and open a file > ourselves (test_supp