Ask Solem a...@opera.com added the comment:
Are we sure this fits the scope of multiprocessing? It's a nice feature,
but such a long and complex example in the documentation is wrong IMHO, if
this is something people need it should be implemented as a reusable
solution, not as an example
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ask Solem rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Ask Solem a...@opera.com added the comment:
Are we sure this fits the scope of multiprocessing? It's a nice feature,
but such a long and complex example in the
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment:
I've removed the example on all active branches. r76433 is the changelist
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5738
Justin MacCallum justin.maccal...@me.com added the comment:
I think this should either be fixed or removed from the documentation. It
is very confusing as is. I have next to no idea what I'm doing, but I've
attached a patch that allows this code to function, at least sort of. You
can now
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com added the comment:
Priorities shifted again at work, so I'll get around to this some time
around early June when I get an opportunity to implement multiprocessing
in my work code...
Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org added the comment:
Garrett, I use FreeBSD myself too, so feel free to bounce anything my way.
--
nosy: +asmodai
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5738
New submission from Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com:
The last example on the multiprocessing documentation page is clearly
wrong. It references a lot of renamed / deprecated API's from processing
that are no longer in multiprocessing.
I'll try and come up with a comparable working example on
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
assignee: georg.brandl - jnoller
nosy: +jnoller
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5738
___
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ugh, I thought that was cleaned up. Don't bother with FreeBSD, or any
other BSDes. If you're willing to do it, just make it work on linux. MP
support on BSD is severely broken right now.
--
___
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com added the comment:
How about this? I'll do both :).
I'm avoiding sync + semaphore stuff because it's still non-portable
(Issue 3770 fun), even though I have a functioning copy of FreeBSD...
but I do have a Mac, VMware fusion, etc, and I'll toss in a working
10 matches
Mail list logo
