[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Tarek Ziadé added the comment: This discussion is taken to distutils-SIG, and a PEP 345 update is being worked out there. (look for 'RFC PEP 345' in Distutils archives) I am closing this issue and proposes that we continue there. -- status: open -> closed _

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: anatoly techtonik wrote: > > anatoly techtonik added the comment: > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg > wrote: >>> >>> Please, be specific. PyPi maintainer or trac-plugin package maintainer >>> or debian package maintainer? Which shoul

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

anatoly techtonik added the comment: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: >> >> Please, be specific. PyPi maintainer or trac-plugin package maintainer >> or debian package maintainer? Which should be mentioned in debian >> package for a trac plugin uploaded to PyPi for easy

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: anatoly techtonik wrote: > > anatoly techtonik added the comment: > >>> Tarek Ziadé added the comment: > >>> Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either side: >>> A - remove the maintainer and maintainer_email >>> B - add the Maintainer and M

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

anatoly techtonik added the comment: >> Tarek Ziadé added the comment: >> Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either side: >> A - remove the maintainer and maintainer_email >> B - add the Maintainer and Maintainer-email in the metadata >> If we don't have a use case, I'd go for A/

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment: Tarek Ziadé wrote: > > Tarek Ziadé added the comment: > >> I'm just suggesting to add the meta-data field in order to recreate >> consistency - not advocating that setup() parameter or its use. > > Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either s

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

anatoly techtonik added the comment: I wonder what does Guido think about this bikeshed? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-lis

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Dariusz Suchojad added the comment: Hello, funny the bug report should surface in the very same time I was looking for a way to put 2 authors in the 'author' field :-) [Antoine Pitrou (pitrou)] > It is still unknown what use case the new "author" scheme would solve > that the old one doesn't

[issue6992] PEP 314 inconsistency (authors/author/maintainer)

Tarek Ziadé added the comment: > I'm just suggesting to add the meta-data field in order to recreate > consistency - not advocating that setup() parameter or its use. Yes but fixing this inconsitency can be done on either side: A - remove the maintainer and maintainer_email B - add the Maintai