[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset ca5fafc2bbda9373c9ab12b76d17614585cffc23 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': closes bpo-29275: Remove Y2K reference from time module docs (GH-17321) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ca5fafc2bbda9373c9ab12b76d17614585cffc23

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset c58a8116475fc9e90fe87b150cde4e535173ec1c by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': closes bpo-29275: Remove Y2K reference from time module docs (GH-17321) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c58a8116475fc9e90fe87b150cde4e535173ec1c

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +16833 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17349 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: New changeset 42bc60ead39c7be9f6bb7329977826e962f601eb by Benjamin Peterson (Callum Ward) in branch 'master': closes bpo-29275: Remove Y2K reference from time module docs (GH-17321)

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +16832 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17348 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Change by Callum Ward : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +16807 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17321 ___ Python tracker

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Callum Ward added the comment: I'd like to work on this issue. I'll come up with a PR today. -- nosy: +callumquick ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Change by Zachary Ware : -- keywords: +easy, newcomer friendly stage: -> needs patch versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

SilentGhost added the comment: The main message there is about the parsing of the two-digit year, so while it might worth it to remove the mention of Y2K, it would only be a minor change. -- nosy: +SilentGhost ___ Python tracker

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

Changes by Elizabeth Myers : -- type: -> enhancement ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue29275] time module still has Y2K issues note

New submission from Elizabeth Myers: It's 2017. I think it's time to remove the Y2K warning from this: https://docs.python.org/3/library/time.html :P. It's 17 years past the sell-by date for that notice. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 285489 nosy: