[issue47081] Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue47081] Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset c6cd3cc93c40363ce704d34a70e6fb73ea1d97a3 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'main': bpo-47081: Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation (GH-32028)

[issue47081] Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation

Matthew Barnett added the comment: I don't think it's a typo, and you could argue the case for "qualifiers", but I still agree with the proposal as it's a more meaningful term in the context. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue47081] Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +30117 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32028 ___ Python tracker

[issue47081] Replace "qualifiers" with "quantifiers" in the re module documentation

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka : In the Web you can find that two terms are used for repetition operators (+, *, ?, and variants): "quantifiers" and "qualifiers". "Quantifiers" is much more common, it is used in Wikipedia and main on-line documentation resources. But "qualifiers" is